comScore Delhi Court Restrains Journos, Activists From Publishing Defamatory Content Against Adani Enterprises - Vibes Of India

Gujarat News, Gujarati News, Latest Gujarati News, Gujarat Breaking News, Gujarat Samachar.

Latest Gujarati News, Breaking News in Gujarati, Gujarat Samachar, ગુજરાતી સમાચાર, Gujarati News Live, Gujarati News Channel, Gujarati News Today, National Gujarati News, International Gujarati News, Sports Gujarati News, Exclusive Gujarati News, Coronavirus Gujarati News, Entertainment Gujarati News, Business Gujarati News, Technology Gujarati News, Automobile Gujarati News, Elections 2022 Gujarati News, Viral Social News in Gujarati, Indian Politics News in Gujarati, Gujarati News Headlines, World News In Gujarati, Cricket News In Gujarati

Vibes Of India
Vibes Of India

Delhi Court Restrains Journos, Activists From Publishing Defamatory Content Against Adani Enterprises

| Updated: September 6, 2025 21:19

A Delhi Court has granted relief to Gujarat based Adani Enterprises Limited(AEL). The court has restrained journalists and others from publishing what it called, unverified defamatory content against the Company.

In an interim order, the court has also directed the journalists and NGOs to remove alleged defamatory material against the firm from articles and social media posts.

Senior Civil Judge Anuj Kumar Singh was hearing a suit filed by the plaintiff (AEL), alleging that coordinated defamatory publications on paranjoy.inadaniwatch.org and adanifiles.com.au, along with related posts and videos, were designed to tarnish the business group’s reputation and disrupt its global operations.

The defendants in the case include Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Ravi Nair, Abir Dasgupta, Ayaskanta Das, Ayush Joshi, Bob Brown Foundation, Dreamscape Network International Private Limited, Getup Limited, Domain Directors Private Limited trading as Instra and John Doe

“There is a prima facie case in favour of the plaintiff. Even the balance of convenience lies in the favour of the plaintiff, considering that continual forwarding/publishing/re-tweeting and trolling would further tarnish his image in public perception and may result in a media trial,” the court has said restraining all the defendants from publishing, distributing or circulating unverified, unsubstantiated and ex-facie defamatory reports about the plaintiff, allegedly tarnishing its reputation, till the next date of hearing.

“To the extent that the articles and posts are incorrect and unverified and prima facie defamatory, defendants nos 1 to 10 are also directed to expunge such defamatory material from their respective articles/social media posts/tweets, and if the same is not feasible, remove the same within five days from the date of this order,” the court said.

The injunction also restrained the defendants from making any further unverified or unsubstantiated statements about AEL and allowed the company to notify additional links for takedown.In case they failed to do so, the court directed intermediaries like Google, YouTube, X etc. to remove or disable access to the alleged defamatory material within 36 hours. The next date for hearing is October 9.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *