MPs/MLAs Can No Longer Claim Immunity In Bribery Matters: SC   - Vibes Of India

Gujarat News, Gujarati News, Latest Gujarati News, Gujarat Breaking News, Gujarat Samachar.

Latest Gujarati News, Breaking News in Gujarati, Gujarat Samachar, ગુજરાતી સમાચાર, Gujarati News Live, Gujarati News Channel, Gujarati News Today, National Gujarati News, International Gujarati News, Sports Gujarati News, Exclusive Gujarati News, Coronavirus Gujarati News, Entertainment Gujarati News, Business Gujarati News, Technology Gujarati News, Automobile Gujarati News, Elections 2022 Gujarati News, Viral Social News in Gujarati, Indian Politics News in Gujarati, Gujarati News Headlines, World News In Gujarati, Cricket News In Gujarati

MPs/MLAs Can No Longer Claim Immunity In Bribery Matters: SC  

| Updated: March 4, 2024 12:12

Bench led by Chief Justice of India also overruled an earlier contrary decision

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court stated on Monday that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) cannot claim any immunity from prosecution under Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution when they are accused of taking bribes. 

Article 105(2) confers on MPs immunity from prosecution in respect of anything said or any vote given by them in Parliament or on any parliamentary committee. Article 194(2) grants similar protection to MLAs.

A Constitution bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud with Justices AS Bopanna, MM Sundresh, PS Narasimha, JB Pardiwala, PV Sanjay Kumar and Manoj Misra delivered the unanimous verdict. 

The issue before the Supreme Court arose from a plea filed by Sita Soren, sister-in-law of former Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren. Hemant Soren had stepped down after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed a money laundering case against him.

Meanwhile, Sita Soren was accused of taking a bribe to vote for a particular candidate in the 2012 Rajya Sabha Elections.

Earlier judgment overruled

The Court also overruled a contrary judgment rendered by it in 1998 in the case of PV Narasimha Rao v. State in which the Court had opined that legislators are immune from being prosecuted for even taking bribes to vote a certain way in a legislative house.

“While analysing majority and minority decision of Narsimha Rao judgment, we disagree and overrule the judgment that parliamentarian can claim immunity…The judgment of the majority in Narsimha Rao which grants immunity to legislators has a grave danger and thus overruled,” the Court held.

The Court stated that the immunity given to legislators with respect to anything said or done in Parliament or in a legislative assembly is connected to the “collective functioning” of the  house. These provisions are meant to promote free deliberations. However, the atmosphere would be vitiated if a member is bribed to deliver a speech, the Court said.

Hence, bribery is not rendered immune under Article 105 (2) or 194 (2) of the Constitution, it said. The Court has also ruled that just the act of taking a bribe could expose the legislator to criminal charges. It is not required for the legislator to do any further act in response to the bribe, it added.

Bribery erodes probity in public life, the Court said. It does not matter whether a vote is cast or not in response to a bribe. The offence of bribery is complete when a bribe is accepted, the Court held.

Also Read: Gujarat Ex-Deputy CM Nitin Patel Withdraws Candidature From Mehsana LS Seat; BJP yet to announce 11 names 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *