comScore Trump's Bid To End Birthright Citizenship Rejected By US Supreme Court - Vibes Of India

Gujarat News, Gujarati News, Latest Gujarati News, Gujarat Breaking News, Gujarat Samachar.

Latest Gujarati News, Breaking News in Gujarati, Gujarat Samachar, ગુજરાતી સમાચાર, Gujarati News Live, Gujarati News Channel, Gujarati News Today, National Gujarati News, International Gujarati News, Sports Gujarati News, Exclusive Gujarati News, Coronavirus Gujarati News, Entertainment Gujarati News, Business Gujarati News, Technology Gujarati News, Automobile Gujarati News, Elections 2022 Gujarati News, Viral Social News in Gujarati, Indian Politics News in Gujarati, Gujarati News Headlines, World News In Gujarati, Cricket News In Gujarati

Vibes Of India
Vibes Of India

Trump’s Bid To End Birthright Citizenship Rejected By US Supreme Court

|United States | Updated: July 1, 2026 08:31

Trump's Bid To End Birthright Citizenship Rejected By US Supreme Court

In a significant ruling, the United States Supreme Court has upheld the long-established principle of birthright citizenship, rejecting an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that sought to deny automatic citizenship to children born in the US to people living in the country illegally or temporarily.

The decision reaffirms that, with very limited exceptions, anyone born on American soil is a US citizen under the Constitution.

Court Relies on the 14th Amendment

The Supreme Court based its ruling on the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, which was adopted after the Civil War and guarantees citizenship to people born in the United States.

The judges also referred to longstanding federal laws that have consistently interpreted the amendment to mean that birth within the country generally grants citizenship, regardless of the immigration status of a child’s parents. By doing so, the court reinforced a constitutional interpretation that has remained in place for more than a century.

Trump’s Executive Order Challenged Existing Policy

President Donald Trump signed the executive order on the first day of his second term as part of his administration’s broader immigration crackdown.

The order sought to deny US citizenship to children born to parents who were either living in the country illegally or were in the United States on temporary visas.

The proposed restrictions would not only have affected undocumented immigrants but also individuals who were legally present in the country, including international students, temporary workers, and people applying for green cards or permanent residency.

Lower Courts Had Already Blocked the Order

Before reaching the Supreme Court, several lower federal courts had blocked Trump’s executive order, preventing it from taking effect anywhere in the United States.

During oral arguments in April, both conservative and liberal Supreme Court justices questioned whether the order was consistent with the Constitution, signaling concerns across the ideological spectrum about its legality.

The case gained additional attention because Trump personally attended the court proceedings, an uncommon move for a sitting president.

Another Major Test of Presidential Power

The birthright citizenship case became another important legal test of President Trump’s use of executive authority.

Throughout his presidency, Trump has frequently pushed the limits of executive power, leading to repeated legal challenges. The Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority, has often ruled in his favour on questions involving presidential authority.

However, this case marked one of the notable instances where the court declined to support his position. In previous cases where the court ruled against him, Trump publicly criticised several of the justices in strong personal terms.

The ruling came as part of Trump’s appeal against a lower court decision from New Hampshire that had struck down the citizenship restrictions.

Immigration Policy at the Centre of the Dispute

The executive order formed a key part of Trump’s wider immigration agenda, which has focused heavily on tightening immigration rules and reducing illegal immigration.

The birthright citizenship policy was the first immigration-related measure from Trump’s administration to receive a final ruling from the Supreme Court.

Earlier, the court had also struck down Trump’s attempt to impose sweeping global tariffs under emergency powers legislation, ruling that the law had been applied beyond its intended scope.

What the Ruling Means

The Supreme Court’s decision means the longstanding practice of birthright citizenship remains unchanged across the United States.

Children born in the country will continue to be recognised as US citizens regardless of whether their parents are undocumented immigrants or are legally in the country on temporary visas, except in the narrow exceptions already recognised under existing law.

The ruling preserves one of the most established constitutional principles in American law while delivering a significant legal setback to one of the Trump administration’s signature immigration proposals.

Also Read: Meloni Quits Smoking, Trump Wants Macron’s Watch, ‘Melodi’ Goes Viral Again: Inside the G7’s Hottest Hot-Mic Moments https://www.vibesofindia.com/meloni-quits-smoking-trump-wants-macrons-watch-melodi-goes-viral-again-inside-the-g7s-hottest-hot-mic-moments/

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *